STATUS: I worked on outstanding issues on two contracts, did a phone conference with an author and my film co-agent, touched base with my marketing director on two outstanding issues from last Friday and answered 118 emails. Maybe tomorrow I can actual tackle my To Do list for the day.
What’s playing on the iPod right now? THE MUMMER’S DANCE by Loreena McKennitt
At the end of each day, I do try and catch up with what is going on in the blog world. I like knowing about what other agents and editors are writing about.
So that was what I was doing when I stumbled upon this entry by Editorial Anonymous. I avidly read the entry and looked at the comments. Only 20 people responded? Unbelievable. I get comments like this every day on my blog and here we have an editor answering some key questions such as:
Q1. Given these recessionary times, are nervous publishers holding back on making decisions to take on a book?
You bet I’m reading that with interest.
Q3. As agents go, do publishers give them a pecking order, and so my agent may be lower in the pecking order?
Inquiring minds what to know!
Q7. Do you think it's a good thing or a bad thing that I've yet to receive a response?
So I obviously need to point out this revealing entry. On submission right now, get ye over there and read Give Me Your Tired, Your Confused, Your Huddled Masses Yearning to Know What the **** Is Going On
And if you’re not at that stage and wondered about these Qs, you’ll also want to check it out.
Q8. From roughly what proportion of partial submissions do you then request the full?
Q9. Of those fulls you request, what proportion of manuscripts would actually be acquired?
Q10. Are you more likely to request a full if you met the author and got on reasonably well with them at a conference or workshop, or would that have no bearing whatsoever on your decision?
Q11. Or if the author had already been published, would that be more persuasive?